Set compuesto de Libro en ingles y Tarot en Ingles, Español, Frances, Italiano, Aleman.

Libro de 175 páginas en ingles. editado por loscarabeo en 2006.

Creado por las artistas Diane Wilkes y Lola Airaghi.

El Tarot de Jane Austen es un tarot verdaderamente maravilloso, con personajes y situaciones de los libros del autor del siglo XIX Inglés, Jane Austen. De colorido suave y muchos detalles en sus ilustraciones
La história del tema central se funde con el tarot con mucha elegancia y compenetración. Su escenografía nos habla de la história de sentido y sensibilidad tan popular como su film de orgullo y prejuicio. Dentro de estas tarjetas, el lector encontrará la misma dirección sabia y práctica moral, espiritual y mundano como se encuentra en la obra de Austen.
Su autora ha sabido perfeccionar la fusión entre la belleza de la histórica antígua con el método del tarot Rider-Waite, creando así un tarot realmente poderoso tanto en su estructura como en su gran armonía interior.
Su caracterización hacen de él una obra en el sentido más perfecto para las lecturas más profundas del alma y del corazón.

English

The Tarot of Jane Austen is a wonderful tarot with characters and situations from the books of 19th century English author, Jane Austen. The cards are fully-illustrated, and mainly feature scenes from Pride and Prejudice, Emma, Sense and Sensibility, and Mansfield Park. Available as a standalone deck, now in a kit with a companion book.

Review of the Tarot of Jane Austen

THIS ARTICLE WAS WRITTEN BY BARBARA MOORE ON NOVEMBER 30, -0001 POSTED UNDER

Summary:
The Tarot of Jane Austen beautifully blends Tarot and the beloved characters and stories of Jane Austen’s classic novels. The marriage of this theme with Tarot is elegantly mastered without feeling forced or contrived. Within these cards, the reader will find the same wise and practical moral, spiritual, and mundane guidance as is found in Austen’s work. This deck is certainly as “must have” for any Jane Austen fan.

In-Depth Review:

The Tarot of Jane Austen is a marvelous achievement. Diane Wilkes has beautifully blended two worlds that, on the surface, are not connected. As she scratches that surface and digs deeper, she reveals that these two worlds do have much in common, for both expound the virtue of balance and provide guidance in recognizing our own moral compass. Based on the Rider-Waite-Smith format in image composition and interpretations, this deck can be used by a fairly wide audience. Unlike many such marriages of theme and Tarot that often feel contrived or forced, there are enough moral, spiritual, and mundane scenes in Jane Austen’s work to provide images for each card.

There are two caveats with this deck: First, Wilkes says in the companion book that “the ideal audience for this deck and book is two-fold; Tarot enthusiasts and devotees of Jane Austen.” She means that both the Tarot enthusiast and Jane Austen fans can equally enjoy it. I must respectfully disagree. I believe that the Jane Austen admirers who know nothing of Tarot would truly enjoy this journey. However, I think that one must have an interest in Austen’s novels for this deck to be useful on any level. The card images are fantastic triggers to parts of the novels. If you know the story, the visual trigger will allow many ah-ha moments and revelations about meanings. But for those who don’t know the stories, I do believe this deck might not be the best choice—unless someone truly wanted to learn about Austen’s works.

Second, if you are interested in this deck, you simply must get the book, too! The book is too delicious to pass up. Wilkes’ knowledge of Austen, the organization of the content, and the writing style make this book one of the best companion books I’ve seen. Unless you know all the Austen novels extremely well, the little white booklet simply isn’t enough. Seriously, don’t cheat yourself out of the pleasure of reading this book.

But more about the book in a moment. Let’s start by considering the cards. First, the deck structure is, as mentioned above, soundly based on Rider-Waite-Smith model. The Major Arcana all have traditional names. The four suits are renamed to resonate more with the Regency era but retain their common associations. Wands are Candlesticks, Cups are Teacups, Swords are Quills, and Pentacles are Coins. The court cards are also renamed, except for the Knight: the Page is a Maiden; the Queen, a Lady; and the King, a Lord. The delicate, detailed images illustrate the scenes very well, except for one little annoying detail. Okay, maybe it is a majorly annoying detail. Many of the gowns look more like Civil War era costumes than Regency dresses. It is almost as if the artist watched the 1940 movie version of Pride and Prejudice starring Greer Garson and Laurence Olivier and drew the images based on that. (Two side notes: Wilkes says this version of the movie isn’t worth watching, but I disagree. Also, the costumes for this version were recycled from the movie Gone with the Wind, hence the Civil War feel.)

The images on the cards are all taken from scenes or characters in the Austen novels, except for the High Priestess, who is Jane herself. A very apt choice. The Lovers show Mr. Darcy looking at Elizabeth Bennett while Caroline Bingley stands behind him, wanting his attention but not getting it—a composition that nicely echoes the Rider-Waite-Smith card in illustration as well as meaning. The Two of Coins is represented by John Willoughby courting the rich Miss Grey while looking longingly at Marianne Dashwood. I could go on and on about the cards. However, those who do not know the characters will find this dull reading (if indeed you are still reading) and those who do know the characters would do better to get the deck and book, settle in, and enjoy.

The book is a treat, particularly for those who love Austen and Tarot. It is substantial, filled with glorious details and clever observations. For each card we are told the novel from which the scene or character is taken, and given a card description, the storyline, a card interpretation, and a bonus: What Would Jane Do? The WWJD sections include a quote from one of her novels and a short paragraph of advice.

The card interpretations include the Golden Dawn astrological correspondences. These parts are a bit inconsistent. At times, the correspondences are only mentioned in passing and not really explained, such as for the Three of Candlesticks, “This card’s attribution is Sun in Aries, which is an easier, more harmonious placement than Mars in Aries.” For the Seven of Teacups, Wilkes writes, “Astrologically speaking, the attribution for this card is Venus (the Goddess of Love) in the emotional sign of Scorpio. This combination can be overly focused on the beautiful fantasies that are based in water, not earth; in other words, the reveries this card suggests are built on uncertain seas, not solid ground.” The latter example says the attribution and attempts to explain how that attribution matches the card meaning. The first example, though, does not. If someone already knows the Golden Dawn attributions (and presumably what they mean), then explanation is unnecessary. If someone does not, these inconsistent presentations do more, I think, to cause confusion and frustration than to educate. It sometimes seems that some books on card interpretation include these associations because it is expected—they rarely include sufficient explanation of what they mean and why or how they add to understanding the card.

In addition to the card section, the book includes four spreads (five, if you count the one variation) and two sample readings, synopses of each of Austen’s novels, and a bibliography. In the section on readings, Wilkes includes a brilliant technique, which I think is unique to narrative decks, such as this one. Readings include layers upon layers of symbolism, correspondences, and relationships. Wilkes suggests adding another layer that she calls “Card Connections.” She writes, “if two cards based on [a single novel] appear in a spread, you can enhance the reading by thinking about how those two characters/situations interact with one another and weave that back-story into your reading.”

You know that I like to end these reviews with a test drive. For me, while this deck is a fascinating study and a great accomplishment, it isn’t one I’ll use often. I do love Jane Austen’s work and have read them all at least once. However, I am not so well-versed in them that I can recall scenes and characters from the top of my head. Nor is my interest deep enough to learn them to that extent. So, for me, doing readings felt cumbersome and awkward. For someone with the right knowledge and interest, though, I imagine the readings would be quite elegant and wise.